Clathrate hydrates, much in the news because of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, are the subject of a new study on a (presumably) different subject:
“Structurability: A Collective Measure of the Structural Differences in Vodkas,” Naiping Hu, Dan Wu, Kelly Cross, Sergey Burikov, Tatiana Dolenko, Svetlana Patsaeva and Dale W. Schaefer, Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 2010. The authors, at the University of Cincinnati in the USA and Moscow State University in Russia, report:
“Although vodka is a reasonably pure mixture of alcohol and water, beverage drinks typically show differences in appeal among brands. The question immediately arises as to the molecular basis, if any, of vodka taste perception. This study shows that commercial vodkas differ measurably from ethanol−water solutions. Specifically, differences in hydrogen-bonding strength among vodkas are observed by 1H NMR, FT-IR, and Raman spectroscopy. Component analysis of the FT-IR and Raman data reveals a water-rich hydrate of composition E·(5.3 ± 0.1)H2O prevalent in both vodka and water−ethanol solutions. This composition is close to that of a clathrate−hydrate observed at low temperature, implying a cage-like morphology. A structurability parameter (SP) is defined by the concentration of the E·(5.3 ± 0.1)H2O hydrate compared to pure ethanol−water at the same alcohol content. SP thus measures the deviation of vodka from “clean” ethanol−water solutions. SP quantifies the effect of a variety of trace compounds present in vodka. It is argued that the hydrate structure E·(5.3 ± 0.1)H2O and its content are related to the perception of vodka.”
(Thanks to investigator Sam Held for bringing this to our attention.)