University, Detroit, US) who explains, in a 2007 paper for the journal Names: A Journal of Onomastics, (Volume 55, Number 4, pp. 349-353) ‘Birds are not More Human than Dogs: Evidence From Naming’.
“This study tested Levi-Strauss’s hypothesis that birds are more likely to be given human names than are dogs or other pets. The hypothesis was not supported. Instead, dogs (and cats) are much more likely to be given human names. The results were interpreted in terms of the relationships people feel with different kinds of pets. Pets housed outside the home are least likely to be given human names. Inside the house, pets kept in cages are less likely to be given human names than are pets allowed to roam freely within the home.”
The next year, professor Abel went on to further-refine understanding of bird-naming protocols with a paper for the journal Psychological Reports (Volume 102, Issue , pp. 271-272.) in which he explains how – PARROTS ARE “MORE HUMAN” THAN CHICKENS.
“Analysis of an Internet database of pets’ names showed owners were more likely to give anthropomorphic names to pets living within homes than those living outside.”
For more examples of professor Abel’s work, see these previous Improbable articles :
•’Human left-sided cradling preferences for dogs’
•’Athletes, Doctors, and Lawyers with First Names Beginning with ‘D’ Die Sooner’ and
NOTE: For reasons of space we can’t list all the professor’s papers – such as :
• Sopranos but not tenors live longer.
• Mortality salience of birthdays on day of death in the Major Leagues.
• Football increases the risk for Lou Gehrig’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
• Heaping in anniversary reaction studies: a cautionary note
• Use of electric blankets and association with prevalence of endometrial cancer
• Birth month and suicide among major league baseball players.
• An improved method for predicting which heavy drinkers become intoxicated.
etc etc etc
The image above is from ‘Métamorphoses du jour’ by Grandville, as cited by Lévi-Strauss