– but also derived a method of visualising how such an ovoid might rest on a flat surface.
“As shown in Figure 2, the gravity force W from the egg’s center of mass O, and the reaction force N from the contact point P lie on the same straight line, and the major axis stabilizes with a tilt. I explained this using the terminology of physics, but everyone knows that eggs tilt like this.”
This tilt, he explains, means that eggs don’t roll nearly as well as spheres do, and instead tend to self-stabilise on gentle slopes. Thus complementing the mathematical focus with a biological / evolutionary one…
For, it’s suggested, ovoid eggs may have an advantage over spherical ones (in that they don’t roll so well). And thus, species of birds which lay a clutch of eggs on say, gently sloping rocky outcrops, may have a better chance of survival. Either way, the professor urges further investigations in egg-rolling – using a gently-sloping tabletop, and an un-boiled ‘ovoid’ egg. “I’d like for those readers who have until now had no interest in the shape of eggs to begin by confirming this experimentally.”
Many thanks to Improbable’s European Bureau Chief Kees (the Duck Guy) Meoliker who neatly encapsulates some evolutionary aspects:
“Owls and kingfishers lay almost spherical eggs (kingfishers are hole-nesters, owls also use open nests), most species lay pyriform (top-shaped) eggs: such eggs can be closely packed together by arranging the narrow ends to point inward. Species breeding on bare ledges tend to have pointed eggs, the small rolling circle of the egg when knocked being adaptively advantageous.”
Also see: A previous Improbable note regarding professor Nishiyama : Here
Coming soon: More research from professor Nishiyama