<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Improbable Research &#187; Newspaper column</title>
	<atom:link href="http://improbable.com/category/newspaper-column/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://improbable.com</link>
	<description>Research that makes people LAUGH and then THINK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Study: socks over shoes prevent falls</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/03/11/guardian-column-196/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/03/11/guardian-column-196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=8411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socks over shoes surpass shoes over socks for strolling on slippery  city slopes, says a study done in New Zealand. In other words – in the  words of the study itself – &#8220;wearing socks over shoes appears to be an  effective and inexpensive method to reduce the likelihood of slipping on  icy footpaths&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://hs3.otago.ac.nz/hs_staff/dsm/FMPro?-db=staff_profiles.fp5&amp;-format=profile.html&amp;-lay=data&amp;name_first=LIANNE&amp;name_last=PARKIN&amp;-find=">Lianne Parkin</a>, Sheila Williams and Patricia  Priest did an experiment to test the wisdom of a local winter tradition.  The trio, based at the University of Otago in Dunedin, published <a href="http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/abstract.php?id=3683">a  report in the New Zealand Medical Journal</a>.</p>
<p>They explain: &#8220;There  are anecdotal reports that pedestrians who wear socks over the top of  their footwear are less likely to slip and fall in icy conditions.  Advocates of this practice include our local council (in Dunedin), which  advises residents who prefer to walk (rather than drive) in icy  conditions to &#8216;put a pair of old socks over your shoes to increase  grip&#8217;&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/mar/09/improbable-research-icy-socks-over-shoes">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/03/11/guardian-column-196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Science of Batman in Turkey</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/03/04/science-turkey-batman/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/03/04/science-turkey-batman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scorpion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=8300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many non-Turks are unaware that Batman is in Turkey. And Batman&#8217;s  contributions to science – like the city of Batman itself, and like the  province of Batman, in which the city is located, and like the Batman  river, which flows through the province – are less well known than one  might [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=batman,+turkey&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Batman,+Turkey&amp;gl=us&amp;ei=dF2MS96MNMiUtgfou7WgBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=geocode_result&amp;ct=image&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CAgQ8gEwAA"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-12068" title="Batman-map" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Batman-map.gif" alt="" width="281" height="195" /></a>Many non-Turks are unaware that Batman is in Turkey. And Batman&#8217;s  contributions to science – like the city of Batman itself, and like the  province of Batman, in which the city is located, and like the Batman  river, which flows through the province – are less well known than one  might expect, considering the fame of the name Batman.</p>
<p>Batman  became Batman in 1957. Until then it sported the less superheroic name  &#8220;Iluh&#8221;. A monograph called <a title="Falls From Heights in and Around the City of Batman" href="http://www.journalagent.com/pubmed/linkout.asp?ISSN=1306-696X&amp;PMID=19353316">Falls From  Heights in and Around the City of Batman</a> appeared in the March 2009  issue of the Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Co-authors  Behçet Al, Cuma Yildirim and Sacid Çoban are based at Gaziantep  University, about 200km to Batman&#8217;s west. They studied the cases  of 538 people who fell to earth in Batman and wound up in Batman state  hospital.</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/mar/02/batman-turkey-improbable-research">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/03/04/science-turkey-batman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Century Perversion, Psychoanalitically</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/02/25/guardian-column-194/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/02/25/guardian-column-194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=8248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perversions get a new lease on life, at least chronologically,  whenever a new century begins. William L Salton, a New York City  clinical psychologist, rang out the old and rang in the new by writing a  study called Perversion in the Twenty-First Century: From the  Holocaust to the Karaoke Bar. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_11846" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 221px"><a href="http://www.jempp.com.au/resort-and-motel-online-merchandise-management-system"><img class="size-full wp-image-11846" title="HotelBathrobe" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/HotelBathrobe.jpg" alt="" width="211" height="102" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Dr. Salton&#39;s patient stole complimentary hotel bathrobes, and had a goal to perform Karaoke in a bar in all 50 American states</p></div>
<p>Perversions get a new lease on life, at least chronologically,  whenever a new century begins. <a href="http://www.nyipt.org/facultybio.html">William L Salton</a>, a New York City  clinical psychologist, rang out the old and rang in the new by writing a  study called <a title="Perversion in the Twenty-First Century: From the Holocaust to  the Karaoke Bar" href="http://www.atypon-link.com/GPI/doi/abs/10.1521/prev.91.1.99.33824">Perversion in the Twenty-First Century: From the  Holocaust to the Karaoke Bar</a>. It appeared in 2004, in <a href="http://www.guilford.com/cgi-bin/cartscript.cgi?page=pr/jnpr.htm&amp;dir=periodicals/per_psych&amp;cart_id=">The  Psychoanalytic Review</a>&#8230;.</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/feb/23/perversion-improbable-research">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column in The Guardian</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/02/25/guardian-column-194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slot Machine Gamblers: Hard to Study?</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/02/18/guardian-column-193/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/02/18/guardian-column-193/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slot machine fruti machine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=8125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to get good payoffs from slot machines, yes. But  it&#8217;s also hard to get good information from slot-machine gamblers,  and that made things awkward for psychologists Mark Griffiths, of  Nottingham Trent University, and Jonathan Parke, of Salford University.  They explained how, in a monograph called Slot Machine Gamblers – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.camh.net/egambling/archive/pdf/EJGI-issue6/EJGI-issue6-opinion.pdf">It&#8217;s hard to get good payoffs from slot machines, yes. </a><a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/x0062x25743382w2/">But  it&#8217;s also hard to get good information from slot-machine gamblers</a>,  and that made things awkward for psychologists <a href="https://www.ntu.ac.uk/apps/Profiles/51652-1-4/Professor_Mark_Griffiths.aspx">Mark Griffiths</a>, of  Nottingham Trent University, and <a href="http://www.business.salford.ac.uk/staff/jonathanparke">Jonathan Parke</a>, of Salford University.  They explained how, in a monograph called Slot Machine Gamblers – Why  Are They So Hard to Study?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.business.salford.ac.uk/staff/jonathanparke"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-11434" title="parke" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/parke.jpeg" alt="" width="110" height="125" /></a>Griffiths and  Parke published it a few  years ago in the Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues. &#8220;We have both  spent over 10 years playing in and researching this area,&#8221; they wrote,  &#8220;and we can offer some explanations on why it is so hard to gather  reliable and valid data.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here are three from their long list&#8230;.</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/feb/16/slot-machine-gamblers-academic-study">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/02/18/guardian-column-193/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter&#8217;s pack of pecking poulets</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/02/12/peters-pack-of-pecking-poulets/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/02/12/peters-pack-of-pecking-poulets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts and science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chickens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pecking order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=11230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THES has an essay about chickens &#8220;and the psychopathic nature of modern &#8216;efficiency&#8217;&#8221;, by Peter Lennox, senior lecturer in spatial perception in artificial environments and director of the Signal Processing and Applications Group, University of Derby:
In today&#8217;s economic climate, efficiency and competitiveness are the  guiding principles of business, of life; more product faster, while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://sparg.derby.ac.uk/SPARG/Staff_PLX.asp"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-11231" title="PeterLennox" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/PeterLennox.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="206" /></a>THES</em> has an <a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=410238&amp;c=1">essay about chickens &#8220;and the psychopathic nature of modern &#8216;efficiency&#8217;&#8221;</a>, by <a href="http://sparg.derby.ac.uk/SPARG/Staff_PLX.asp">Peter Lennox</a>, senior lecturer in spatial perception in artificial environments and director of the Signal Processing and Applications Group, University of Derby:</p>
<blockquote><p>In today&#8217;s economic climate, efficiency and competitiveness are the  guiding principles of business, of life; more product faster, while  taking up less space. But are these concepts in our interests at all?  Efficiency without ethics is psychopathic. And how much cleverer than  chickens are we, ultimately?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/02/12/peters-pack-of-pecking-poulets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lazy bureaucrat problem</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/02/11/guardian-column-192/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/02/11/guardian-column-192/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazy bureaucrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=7992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lazy bureaucrat problem is ancient, as old as bureaucracy itself.  In the 1990s, mathematicians decided to look at the problem. They have  since made progress that, depending on your point of view, is either  impressive or irrelevant.
Four scientists at the State University  of New York, Stony Brook issued the first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/people/faculty/EstherArkin.html"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-11148" title="Arkin" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Arkin.jpg" alt="" width="136" height="204" /></a>The lazy bureaucrat problem is ancient, as old as bureaucracy itself.  In the 1990s, mathematicians decided to look at the problem. They have  since made progress that, depending on your point of view, is either  impressive or irrelevant.</p>
<p>Four scientists at the State University  of New York, Stony Brook issued the first formal report. <a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/rux1v1y4m9m6c5pd">The Lazy  Bureaucrat Scheduling Problem</a>, by <a href="http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/people/faculty/EstherArkin.html">Esther Arkin</a>, <a href="http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~bender/">Michael Bender</a>, <a href="http://www.ams.sunysb.edu/~jsbm/">Joseph  Mitchell</a> and <a href="http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~skiena/">Steven Skiena</a>, appeared in the journal <em>Algorithms and Data  Structures</em>. The study describes a prototypically lazy bureaucrat,  transforming this annoying person into a collection of mathematical  formulas, theorems, proofs, and algorithms&#8230;.</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/feb/09/improbable-research-lazy-bureaucrats">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/02/11/guardian-column-192/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep that waist to yourself!</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/02/04/guardian-column-191/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/02/04/guardian-column-191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jealousy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoulders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=7939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which body parts do students pay attention to when they size up their  rivals in romance? Pieternel Dijkstra and Bram Buunk went to a  university library to find the answer. They handed out survey forms to  students who were there studying books or studying each others&#8217; body  parts.
A monograph called Sex [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pieterneldijkstra.nl/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-10768" title="Dijkstra" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Dijkstra.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="191" /></a>Which body parts do students pay attention to when they size up their  rivals in romance? <a title="http://www.pieterneldijkstra.nl" href="http://">Pieternel Dijkstra</a> and <a href="http://www.apbuunk.com/">Bram Buunk</a> went to a  university library to find the answer. They handed out survey forms to  students who were there studying books or studying each others&#8217; body  parts.</p>
<p>A monograph called <a href="http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1090513801000708">Sex Differences in the Jealousy-Evoking Nature of a Rival&#8217;s  Body Build</a>, published in 2001 in the journal <em>Evolution and Human  Behavior</em>, tells what Dijkstra and Buunk learned from this endeavour. The  two psychologists, based at the University of Groningen in the  Netherlands, begin by summarising the state of knowledge in their field.  Everyone&#8217;s ultimate goal: clear up the mysteries of romantic rivalry  and jealousy&#8230;.</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/feb/02/improbable-research-sexual-characteristics-jealousy">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian</em><em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/02/04/guardian-column-191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The face value of numbers</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/01/28/guardian-column-190/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/01/28/guardian-column-190/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=7809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A smiley-face is very expressive, statistically. By tweaking the  eyes, mouth and other bits, you can literally put a meaningful face on  any jumble of numbers. Herman Chernoff pointed this out in 1973 in the  Journal of the American Statistical Association, in a monograph called  The Use of Faces to ­Represent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/2284077"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-10247" title="Drawings-from-Chernoffs-T-001" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Drawings-from-Chernoffs-T-001.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="150" /></a>A smiley-face is very expressive, statistically. By tweaking the  eyes, mouth and other bits, you can literally put a meaningful face on  any jumble of numbers. <a href="http://www.stat.harvard.edu/People/Faculty/Herman_Chernoff/Herman_Chernoff_Index.html">Herman Chernoff</a> pointed this out in 1973 in the <em> Journal of the American Statistical Association</em>, in a monograph called <a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/2284077"> The Use of Faces to ­Represent Points in K-Dimensional Space  ­Graphically</a>.</p>
<p>Subsequently, folks took to calling these things  Chernoff faces. Chernoff faces can make statistical analysis into a  recognisably human activity. Most people, when shown some  statistics, sigh and get boggled. But Chernoff realised that almost  everyone is good at reading faces. So he devised recipes to <a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/1251471">convert any  set of statistics</a> into <a href="http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~wiseman/chernoff/">an equivalent bunch of smiley-face drawings</a>&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jan/26/smiley-face-statistical-analysis">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in <em>The Guardian</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/01/28/guardian-column-190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lower Working-Class Women&#8217;s Expletives</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/01/21/guardian-column-189/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/01/21/guardian-column-189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=7679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expletives of Lower Working-Class Women, published in 1992 in the journal Language in Society, is a rare sociolinguistic study of this inherently provocative topic. &#8220;This article,&#8221; wrote author Susan Hughes of the University of Salford, &#8220;sets out to look at the reality of the swearing used by a group of women from a deprived inner-city [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/4168347"></a><a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/4168347"><img class="size-full wp-image-9970 alignright" title="HughesStudyChart" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/HughesStudyChart.gif" alt="" width="250" height="213" /></a><a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/4168347">Expletives of Lower Working-Class Women</a>, published in 1992 in the journal <em>Language in Society</em>, is a rare sociolinguistic study of this inherently provocative topic. &#8220;This article,&#8221; wrote author Susan Hughes of the University of Salford, &#8220;sets out to look at the reality of the swearing used by a group of women from a deprived inner-city area.&#8221; Hughes surveyed six women in <a href="http://www.chavtowns.co.uk/2005/04/salford-in-particular-ordsall-estate/">Ordsall</a>, a part of <a href="http://www.salford.gov.uk/">Salford</a> said to be characterised by &#8220;social malaise&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;My observations of these women,&#8221; Hughes wrote, &#8220;showed me that, contrary to some theories, they use a strong vernacular style &#8230; These women are proud of their swearing&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jan/19/women-swearing-research-proud-inner-city">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in </em>The Guardian<em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/01/21/guardian-column-189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministry of Clowns</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/01/14/guadian-column/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/01/14/guadian-column/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clowns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=7523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angelika Richter and Lori Zonner have a funny way of captivating readers. In a study called Clowning – An Opportunity for Ministry they write: &#8220;Experiences over five years interacting with patients as the clown Jingles and the experiment and experience of one afternoon as the clown Hairie in a hospital led the authors to reflect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="200" height="165" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ji4yEWSjuI&amp;feature" /><param name="align" value="right" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="200" height="165" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ji4yEWSjuI&amp;feature" align="right"></embed></object>Angelika Richter and Lori Zonner have a funny way of captivating readers. In a study called <a href="http://mona.uwi.edu/spsw/downloads/coursemat/SY38F/2008-2009/sem2/clown%20doctors.pdf">Clowning – An Opportunity for Ministry</a> they write: &#8220;Experiences over five years interacting with patients as the clown Jingles and the experiment and experience of one afternoon as the clown Hairie in a hospital led the authors to reflect on the deeper meaning of clowns &#8230; Before sharing further experiences with clowning in ministry, and telling about one afternoon when Jingles and Hairie were on their way through the hospital, let us first describe a common meaning of clowning.&#8221;</p>
<p>Richter, a chaplain and minister at Philipps University in Marburg, Germany, and her colleague Zonner published their monograph in 1996 in <em>The Journal of Religion and Health</em>&#8230;.</p>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jan/12/improbable-research-clowns">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in </em>The Guardian<em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/01/14/guadian-column/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forceful hair-combing measured</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2010/01/07/guardian-column-188/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2010/01/07/guardian-column-188/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=7463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1966, hair combing made noise on both sides of the Atlantic – musical noise to the east, scientific to the west.
In England, the Beatles released a song that said: &#8220;Woke up, got out of bed, dragged a comb across my head&#8221;. In America, William C Waggoner and George V Scott of the Colgate-Palmolive Company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1966, hair combing made noise on both sides of the Atlantic – musical noise to the east, scientific to the west.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.beatlelinks.net/forums/showthread.php?t=29497"><img class="size-full wp-image-9211  alignright" title="johngeorge" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/johngeorge.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="250" /></a>In England, the Beatles released <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiFYOn1AFms">a song that said: &#8220;Woke up, got out of bed, dragged a comb across my head&#8221;</a>. In America, William C Waggoner and George V Scott of the Colgate-Palmolive Company published a monograph explaining how they had <a href="http://journal.scconline.org//pdf/cc1966/cc017n03/p00171-p00179.pdf">measured, with a fair degree of precision, the sound of a comb being dragged through a hank of hair</a>&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jan/05/improbable-research-hair-combing">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a></em> in The Guardian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2010/01/07/guardian-column-188/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He watches hands not being washed</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2009/12/17/guardian-column-187/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2009/12/17/guardian-column-187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=6998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this hand-sanitiser-obsessed era, Professor John Trinkaus, a man who studies things that annoy him, got annoyed. This resulted, inevitably, in a study called Hand Sanitising: An Informal Look.Trinkaus saw people being urged &#8220;to frequently wash their hands, or otherwise sanitise their hands, as a precaution against the flu&#8221;. But, he wondered, to what extent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.uic.edu/depts/envh/Departmental/Newsletter/ObserverSept2006p4.htm"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7872" title="handWashingImage" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/handWashingImage.jpg" alt="handWashingImage" width="161" height="173" /></a>In this hand-sanitiser-obsessed era, Professor John Trinkaus, a man who studies things that annoy him, got annoyed. This resulted, inevitably, in a study called <a href="http://improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume15/v15i6/trinkaus-15-6-sanitizer-preprint.pdf">Hand Sanitising: An Informal Look</a>.Trinkaus saw people being urged &#8220;to frequently wash their hands, or otherwise sanitise their hands, as a precaution against the flu&#8221;. But, he wondered, to what extent did the public respond to this hoopla? The answer apparently is: not much&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/dec/15/hand-sanitisation-hospital-research">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2009/12/17/guardian-column-187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tall tales of the past</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2009/12/10/guardian-column-186/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2009/12/10/guardian-column-186/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=6832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fabulous stories – fabulous in one or another sense of that word – are the essence of a much-used American history textbook called Making Thirteen Colonies 1600-1740, written by Joy Hakim and published by Oxford University Press.
The stories enchant compactly. On page 9, the book says: &#8220;A long time ago – actually, it was almost 4,000 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Making-Thirteen-Colonies-1600-1740-History/dp/0195327160/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1260231805&amp;sr=1-1"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7660" title="MakingThirteen-cover_150w" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/MakingThirteen-cover_150w.jpg" alt="MakingThirteen-cover_150w" width="150" height="184" /></a>Fabulous stories – fabulous in one or another sense of that word – are the essence of a much-used American history textbook called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Making-Thirteen-Colonies-1600-1740-History/dp/0195327160/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1260231805&amp;sr=1-1">Making Thirteen Colonies 1600-1740</a>, written by <a href="http://www.joyhakim.com/">Joy Hakim</a> and published by Oxford University Press.</p>
<p>The stories enchant compactly. <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=11kbfFxbfsUC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=editions:ISBN0195153219#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">On page 9, the book says</a>: &#8220;A long time ago – actually, it was almost 4,000 years ago – in the city of Ur, there lived a man named Abraham&#8230; Abraham will turn out to be important – to people all over the world – and to us in America.&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re never told how or why Abraham is important to American history. And we&#8217;re not told that he may be a mythical fellow. The book introduces Abraham and Moses and other biblical people in the same way that, a few pages later, it serves up George Washington.</p>
<p>We also meet the Greek writer Homer&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/dec/08/abraham-history-fables-hakim-research">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2009/12/10/guardian-column-186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rat-catcher&#8217;s art</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2009/12/03/guardian-column-185/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2009/12/03/guardian-column-185/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=6759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[England&#8217;s professional rat-catching community produced at least two instructive books during the Victorian years.
Studies in the Art of Rat-Catching, by Henry C Barclay, went on sale in London in 1896. Avowedly educational, it&#8217;s also a rambling entertainment that finishes up with this jolly sentiment: &#8220;I have heard from half a dozen head-masters of schools that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>England&#8217;s professional rat-catching community produced at least two instructive books during the Victorian years.</p>
<p><a href="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/FullRevelationsRat.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7518" title="FullRevelationsRat" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/FullRevelationsRat.gif" alt="FullRevelationsRat" width="200" height="107" /></a><a href="http://www.archive.org/details/studiesinartofra00barkrich">Studies in the Art of Rat-Catching</a>, by Henry C Barclay, went on sale in London in 1896. Avowedly educational, it&#8217;s also a rambling entertainment that finishes up with this jolly sentiment: &#8220;I have heard from half a dozen head-masters of schools that they find the art of rat-catching is so distasteful to their scholars, and so much above their intellect, and so fatiguing an exercise to the youthful mind, that they feel obliged to abandon the study of it and replace it once more by those easier and pleasanter subjects, Latin and Greek&#8221;. Two years later, Ike Matthews, in Manchester, published his <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/fullrevelationso00mattrich">Full Revelations of a Professional Rat-Catcher after 25 Years&#8217; Experience</a>&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/dec/01/rat-catchers-improbable-research">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2009/12/03/guardian-column-185/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early strokes of genius</title>
		<link>http://improbable.com/2009/11/26/guardian-column-184/</link>
		<comments>http://improbable.com/2009/11/26/guardian-column-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improbable.com/?p=6611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psychologists still grind away (sometimes at each other) at explaining what genius is, and where it comes from. The effort, now weary and tendentious, was exciting in its earlier days. In 1920, Lewis Terman and Jessie Chase of Stanford University published a report called The Psychology, Biology and Pedagogy of Genius, summarising all the important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2000/julaug/articles/terman.html"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7341" title="Terman" src="http://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Terman.jpg" alt="Terman" width="144" height="142" /></a>Psychologists still grind away (sometimes at each other) at explaining what genius is, and where it comes from. The effort, now weary and tendentious, was exciting in its earlier days. In 1920, <a href="http://histsoc.stanford.edu/pdfmem/TermanL.pdf">Lewis Terman</a> and Jessie Chase of Stanford University published a report called <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=CpnRAAAAMAAJ&amp;pg=PA397&amp;lpg=PA397&amp;dq=%22Psychology,+Biology+and+Pedagogy+of+Genius%22&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=21Y4CeXZzP&amp;sig=BN6AxQGMkMGGEJG_m_DAaBqnMpw&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=jycLS72oD8zelAf3o72FBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ved=0CBoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&amp;q=%22Psychology%2C%20Biology%20and%20Pedagogy%20of%20Genius%22&amp;f=false">The Psychology, Biology and Pedagogy of Genius</a>, summarising all the important new literature on the subject.<span id="more-6611"></span></p>
<p>Those early 20th-century psychologists showed a collective genius for disagreeing about almost everything. JCM Garnett, in a study called <a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&amp;uid=1919-10041-006">General Ability, Cleverness and Purpose</a>, offered a formula for genius. Measure a person&#8217;s general ability; then measure their cleverness, then square both numbers and add them together, then take the square root. Genius.</p></blockquote>
<p>So begins <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/nov/24/improbable-research-genius-marc-abrahams">this week&#8217;s Improbable Research column</a> in The Guardian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://improbable.com/2009/11/26/guardian-column-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
